AUSTRALIA ✦ PRE-PILOT CONCEPT ✦ HUMAN DECISION REQUIRED ✦ EVIDENCE BEFORE CLAIMS ✦ SEEKING A BOUNDED DESIGN PILOT ✦ AUSTRALIA ✦ PRE-PILOT CONCEPT ✦ HUMAN DECISION REQUIRED ✦
AI build & training plan

Build the evidence before the model.

Accuracy comes from field protocol and labelled outcomes first. AI earns more responsibility only after it performs on independent farm data.

Illustrative LivingShield farm and field scene

Months 0-3 - data foundation

Define common zone, crop, device, observation, action and outcome fields. Collect baseline and require source/quality metadata.

Months 3-6 - explainable product

Use rules, thresholds, data-quality checks and human-approved workflows. These are auditable and do not need a large training dataset.

Months 6-12 - labelled pilot learning

Growers and advisers record what a signal meant after inspection. This creates the labelled examples needed to evaluate anomaly detection or image support.

Months 12-18 - controlled model evaluation

Test candidate models on held-out farms/seasons, not the same data they learned from. Report false alerts, missed events, precision and recall by crop and region.

Release only with guardrails

Retain confidence state, evidence source, human override, model version, incident review and a clear rollback path.

Important: predictive AI is a future pilot-stage capability, not a current claim.

Pre-pilot information centre

Review the evidence pathway before you commit.

LivingShield is seeking a narrow first pilot, built with growers, advisers, hardware partners and research collaborators. The product must earn trust through use, accuracy and clear farm value.

There is no live pilot outcome or public funding offer on this site.

Available now

Pilot information, not a data-collection form.

The public contact channel is not configured yet. Until it is, this site intentionally does not collect personal, farm or investment information.

A monitored inbox, privacy process and legal pilot documents are required before outreach.